Thursday, January 10, 2008
Blog tagging... and The Three Investigators
Yes, there's a link between the two items in the title. A tenuous one, admittedly, but there you go. I've never been blog tagged before, but for those don't know, it's kind of like a chain-letter, only more acceptable. We've all received chain letters — emails that suggest we send on this "important message" to ten other people. Frankly those are a total waste of time, not to mention the fact that they clog up email systems (as they're designed to do). The theory with chain emails is that you send an email to ten people, and those ten people send the same email to another ten people each, and so on, until suddenly — within a mere six rounds — a million people have received this pointless email! It's a very serious bit of spamming, and yet a lot of people think it's cute and funny because the email normally contains some mildly amusing joke or a "heart-warming" story. Be warned, those of you who play a part in the chain email game — you're just helping to slow down and clog your own email server.
On this subject, I complain about spam like everyone else, but I also complain about not-so-obvious spam caused by kind-hearted but misguided deeds — such as when someone sends me an e-greeting card. On receiving one I immediately think, "Oh, thanks — you've just given my email address to a website business and most likely given them permission to send me a load of adverts in the future, not to mention selling my address to other companies." It's hard to complain about this to someone who's just sent me an e-card though, so I mumble my thanks and bang my head on the wall.
Now, my good friend Heather in Australia sent me a blog tag yesterday. I jokingly grumped about it, especially when she said is was "bad manners" in the blogging world to ignore a blog tag. Really!! And I bet the originators of the blog tagging idea came up with that idea too, in an effort to shame those who don't comply. A two-pronged attack — send out blog tags, and also start a rumor that it's bad manners to ignore blog tags. Very clever (he said, rolling his eyes).
That said, on this occasion I'm happy to comply. Partly because it's my first blog tag and I'm willing to give it a try, and also because — unlike chain emails — in theory you end up with inbound links to your site (that is, if everyone follows the rules). Oh, and I couldn't bear to offend Heather by ignoring it. :-)
The rules...
- Link to the person that tagged you.
- Post the rules on your blog.
- Share six non-important things/habits/quirks about yourself.
- Tag six people and at the end of your post, link to their blogs.
- Let each person know they have been tagged by leaving a comment on their blog.
Quirks and habits...
1) When I'm really enjoying a meal, I tap the plate twice with my knife. I never knew I did that until my best buddy Neill pointed it out one day. Now I do it deliberately (as well as unintentionally) and say, "Mm, two taps fresh!" (I wonder if anyone remembers/knows the commercial with the Indian guy who would say, "Two thumbs fresh!")
2) While watching TV, I'll get up to move things that "shouldn't" be in my periphery: a door standing wide open when it should only be slightly ajar to allow the cats in and out; one of my daughter's shoes in the middle of the floor; clothing draped over the end of the sofa; a light on that isn't normally on; even some unknown shiny object on the floor that gleams annoyingly while I'm trying to focus on the screen.
3) When I'm deep in conversation while driving, I will happily sail right past the road I'm supposed to take. When I'm thinking about which way I'm supposed to be going, my end of the conversation turns into, "So... er... I went to... er... I was on my way to..." Apparently I can't mix driving with talking. And yet, I can drive and talk on the phone for ages and never go wrong. Why is that?
4) When I receive a book from eBay, and my wife sees it, I seem to have got into the habit of saying, "A real bargain, this!" Even though it might not be that cheap.
5) When I buy a burger and fries, my fries have to be piping hot. I'll be sure to test one the moment they're handed over the counter, and if it's not perfect, then I demand fresh ones. The server who gets the fries ready and puts them on the side while waiting for the burger to come through had better be warned — I'm not having those fries! Letting fries got cold should be MY choice, and no one else's.
6) I will NEVER get over the sense of satisfaction when receiving checks in the mail for website work. Sheer joy. :-)
Who I'm going to tag...
Nigel at Moonraker Nights, because he doesn't post enough and this will hopefully give him a prod!
Ming at Ming's Busy Days, because she's probably the most likely to excel in this kind of thing.
Neill at NeillRees.com, because he's got a new blog (eagle-eyed visitors will notice his template is very similar to this one, because I set it up for him) and because he likes to write.
There are some others I could tag but won't, because I don't feel comfortable doing so. By the way, Nigel, Ming and Neill — I won't be offended if you totally ignore this tag! :-)
And now back to the link to The Three Investigators, as hinted at in the title of this post. I'm reading The Mystery of the Whispering Mummy (no mystery there, my Mummy used to whisper to Daddy about me all the time) and by coincidence there's a technnique that Jupiter Jones employs to find out information. Fatty should listen to this — it's a great idea! It's called the Ghost-to-Ghost Hook-up. Jupiter phones five of his friends and asks if any of them have seen such-and-such (like a man with a crooked finger and thin mouth, driving a black Bentley). He also asks his five friends if they can ask five of their own friends the same question, and each of those friends are asked to ask five of theirs, and so on. Any information should be reported back to Jupiter Jones.
In theory it's a great idea, and should spread the word about the city in a matter of hours. Invariably this helps Jupiter, Bob and Pete solve their mysteries. But there are some problems. First, it relies on each friend phoning five others, IF they have five friends to phone. What if one of his friends is Billy No Friends? And what are the chances that the same circle of friends will be called time and time again by other friends participating in the same scheme? If Joe phones five of his friends, he'd have to tell each not to phone the other four, just to avoid repetition. That could be a nightmare, especially after a couple of rounds of calls:
"Right, I'll phone John, Joe, Simon, Brent, and David — what? You already spoke to Brent? And Colin already spoke to David and John? Are you sure? Well, all right, I'll replace them with George and... oh, how about Sue and Pam? They know already? Your brother called them? Who else did your brother call? ... No, I don't know them, but I think Don knows the sister of Charlie's friend, so..."
Seems to me that it would be a logistical nightmare within a relatively small city limit!
This post has 19 comments
Very interesting quirkiness you have! It seems we all have a little obsessive-compulsive inside us screaming to come out.
Thanks for participating -- even if it was under duress. That's OK, I shall forever be known as the one who talked Keith into participating in a tag.
PS. GREAT to see ol' Nige confronted too. :P
Amazing how your comment to your wife is exactly what I say!
> It is sooooo like you to turn a tag into a full-blown diatribe against the spam machine!
And for good reason! :-)
[Indy]
> Erm... Okay, I was so impressed with the way you started this entry, but then you, like so many others, caved in to a meme blog chain letter. Argh.
I know, I'm ashamed of myself. It's a once-only transgression, I promise! I don't believe a blog-tag is quite as bad as an email chain letter, as they start out with a comment and a link to the blogger's site -- neither of which is bad. But, while saying that, I do understand that many blogs are part of blogger.com, wordpress.com, and a handful of others, so the servers belonging to these companies must get a pretty heavy hit during tagging sessions. And yes, here I am, perpetuating the tag and adding to their grief. *red-faced*
There's some VERY interesting reading on your site, Indy, particularly the article about the nine-year-old girl being threatened with her life if she didn't pass on the chain email. That's despicable. I'm going to keep reading through and maybe I'll learn more and become even more ashamed of myself for continuing this tag against my better judgment!
Nigel, Ming, and Neill, I'd love to read about your six quirks, but now I'd almost prefer it if you ignored the part about tagging others!
Heather -- I hope you're reading. :-)
Too late, Keith, old bean -- both Nigel and I have tagged people!
Are you reading the Three Investigators books in order, Keith? I've read the first nine titles and my favourite was "The Mystery of the Screaming Clock." A very clever, quirky story which kept me hooked from beginning to end.
#1 The Secret of Terror Castle (returned to library)
#2 The Mystery of the Stuttering Parrot
#3 The Mystery of the Whispering Mummy
#4 The Mystery of the Green Ghost
#7 The Mystery of the Fiery Eye
#16 The Mystery of the Nervous Lion (returned to library)
I'm about to read #7 next. Of the above books, I liked Terror Castle and Green Ghost best, then Stuttering Parrot, then Whispering Mummy, and finally Nervous Lion. I'll let you know about Fiery Eye...
I'm not a blogger so I'm afraid I just skimmed all that stuff about blog-tagging! ;-)
THIS POST HAS 14 COMMENTS
What, are you kidding me? Fourteen posts? When I read this article, I didn't read it properly, I mean, word by word. I went upwards and read it, this time word by word and yes, I got it... this is really interesting. Cannot sending e-cards... that's awful. How can we post a card to a friend who lives at Australia when you are in Canada?
To tell the truth, Keith, I don't really understand this article of yours, though the words are interesting. Of course, you are the sorceress that turns sour orange into sweet mango ;-)...
The Girl Who Howled,
Mimsy
> Good old Anita for turning round the comments from inane drivel to something sensible!
[Anita]
>I'm not a blogger so I'm afraid I just skimmed all that stuff about blog-tagging! ;-)
[Mimsy]
>To tell the truth, Keith, I don't really understand this article of yours...
Heh. When I blather on about non-Blyton stuff in a Blyton-related blog, I'm well aware that this might put some people off (especially when it's web-related technical stuff). "Where's the connection to Enid Blyton?" I can hear you screaming. "What a rip!"
So I do need y'all to tell me if I veer off course too much. Funny thing is, despite the non-Blyton connection, it's kind of interesting to note the number of comments on recent posts:
Blog tagging... and The Three Investigators (16 including this one)
A whiff of adventure (6 comments)
editng poorley ritten posts (10 comments)
My slowly-growing collection (19 comments)
A cave with a curtain of kudzu (4 comments)
Rotters who steal website content (10 comments)
There's a trend here -- blog tagging, editing posts, and stealing website content each got 10 or more comments! With the post about editing, even Nigel found something of interest in my inane drivel. Of course, the most popular post to date (at least judging by the number of comments) is the one about collecting Enid Blyton books -- no great surprise there!
So, I'm willing to learn and adapt if anyone truly wishes I'd shut up about non-Blyton related matters. :-)
(As it happens, I've just picked up a Secret Seven book so I'm pretty sure I'll have something to say about that soon...)
Stuttering Parrot
Fiery Eye
Screaming Clock
Singing Serpent (I find M V Carey's dialouge nicely tongue-in-cheek -- her plots are pretty weak though)
Dead Man's Riddle
POSTS ARE NOW CLOSED
